Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:49101 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753881Ab3KMQwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:52:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:52:04 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Anna Schumaker , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] NFSD: Implement SEEK Message-ID: <20131113165204.GB8676@infradead.org> References: <1384283048-7699-1-git-send-email-bjschuma@netapp.com> <20131112194529.GA26341@fieldses.org> <52828767.3030909@netapp.com> <20131112195911.GA28033@fieldses.org> <5283A24D.4010309@netapp.com> <5283A3B7.8080405@netapp.com> <20131113161527.GA10046@infradead.org> <20131113164959.GL28033@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20131113164959.GL28033@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:49:59AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > This isn't a candidate for 3.13, and SEEK didn't look like the most > problematic bit, so with a couple more months I'm hoping we'll be more > confident about the protocol? Wish I knew. The ieft list seems to be at an awfully small pace, and the actual spec seems another layer separated from that. People who are more familar with the process might have to chime in.