Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54052 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754838Ab3KLHdA (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:33:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:47:03 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jeff Layton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stanislav Kinsbursky , devel@openvz.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, oleg@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, bharrosh@panasas.com Subject: Re: call_usermodehelper in containers Message-ID: <20131112004703.GB15377@kroah.com> References: <20131111071825.62da01d1@tlielax.poochiereds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20131111071825.62da01d1@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 07:18:25AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > We have a bit of a problem wrt to upcalls that use call_usermodehelper > with containers and I'd like to bring this to some sort of resolution... > > A particularly problematic case (though there are others) is the > nfsdcltrack upcall. It basically uses call_usermodehelper to run a > program in userland to track some information on stable storage for > nfsd. I thought the discussion at the kernel summit about this issue was: - don't do this. - don't do it. - if you really need to do this, fix nfsd thanks, greg k-h