Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:34458 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754095Ab3LDOZN (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:25:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:25:09 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jeff Layton , gartim@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: when reusing an existing repcache entry, unhash it first Message-ID: <20131204142509.GA14646@fieldses.org> References: <1386015979-27511-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <20131203102517.GA12576@infradead.org> <20131203132112.1f19c014@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20131204083336.GB30216@infradead.org> <20131204075402.7b00d09d@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20131204130944.GA3464@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20131204130944.GA3464@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:09:44AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:54:02AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Are you suggesting that we shouldn't try to bound the cache at all and > > should instead just let it grow and rely on the shrinker to keep it in > > check? > > Exactly. As long as the lookup times stay reasonable.... --b.