Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:53694 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758523Ab3LFSJA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:08:58 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Isaenko Subject: Re: nfs vs xfstests 193 Message-ID: <20131206180858.GA2803@infradead.org> References: <20131106115648.GA24804@infradead.org> <52A1CF22.106@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <52A1CF22.106@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 05:20:34PM +0400, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote: > Just to make the behaviour more consistent between NFS and other > "local" file systems as It was done by > commit https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=0953e620de0538cbd081f1b45126f6098112a598 Seems like we got others in line with XFS behavior. I'd prefer to have NFS follow this as well.