Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:57783 "EHLO mail-qa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751114AbaBCUpE (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:45:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:45:00 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Li Zefan , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: include xattr.h from fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c Message-ID: <20140203204500.GJ30250@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140203193107.GH30250@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140203193107.GH30250@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:31:07PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c is making use of xattr but was getting linux/xattr.h > indirectly through linux/cgroup.h, which will soon drop the inclusion > of xattr.h. Explicitly include linux/xattr.h from nfs3proc.c so that > compilation doesn't fail when linux/cgroup.h drops linux/xattr.h. > > As the following cgroup changes will depend on these changes, it > probably would be easier to route this through cgroup branch. Would > that be okay? > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Applied to cgroup/for-3.14-fixes w/ Trond's ack added. Thanks. -- tejun