Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:54690 "EHLO mail-qc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752262AbaCJXXq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:23:46 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id i8so8608631qcq.23 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: NFS4 patch 08/20 (BAD_SEQID recovery) From: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <531DF5B4.9050001@pml.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:23:44 -0400 Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <0BE71BDE-FFFB-4124-B037-8ABBD5C20455@primarydata.com> References: <53199445.3010808@pml.ac.uk> <69B89FEE-5B58-468F-95CE-B384033B2E65@primarydata.com> <531DF5B4.9050001@pml.ac.uk> To: Ben Taylor Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mar 10, 2014, at 13:26, Ben Taylor wrote: > Hi Trond > > On 07/03/14 13:05, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>> Can anyone tell me what happened to this patch please? Was it lost or >>>> superseded? >> It was superseded by commit 95b72eb0bdef6 (NFSv4: Ensure we do not reuse open owner names), which is available in linux 3.4 and newer. > > Many thanks. That's a puzzle then, because we're running 3.9 and up and > already have that patch (I've checked). > > I've attached my Wireshark dump (or at least a subset of it - > unfortunately I don't have the original call, the dump I've got is all > the same) - don't know if this tells you anything it doesn't tell me? > I'm not exactly experienced at reading these things! > It looks as if the client is trying to convert a delegation into an open stateid as part of returning that delegation, but the server is disputing the sequence id value. What server is this? _________________________________ Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@primarydata.com