Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:46898 "EHLO mail-qc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752432AbaD3Tjk (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:39:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53614C03.80606@oracle.com> References: <53614C03.80606@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:39:39 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFSoRDMA developers bi-weekly meeting announcement (4/30) From: Or Gerlitz To: Shirley Ma , Chuck Lever Cc: Jeff Becker , "" , "Cayton, Phil" , "Coulter, Susan K" , Anna Schumaker , "" , Steve Wise , Allen Andrews , Jeff Layton , linux-rdma , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Shirley Ma wrote: [...] > 3. Upstream NFSoRDMA status: So does it currently works...? I understand that Yan tried it out today, and @ least one side just crashed. Chuck, I assume there is a configuration which basically works for you and allow you to develop the upstream patches, you send, right? can you send us your .config and exact NFS/rNFS options you use and works basically OK? Or.