Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:39:09 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V1 00/22]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl
 interoperability
Message-ID: <20140428043909.GA26778@infradead.org>
References: <1398615293-22931-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <1398615293-22931-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org

This doesn't address any or the previous points:

 - common implementation instead of the godawful boilerplate code
   (and we even fixed most of this for Posix ACL by now, so even less
   reason to do the same crap again!)
 - common data structure with Posix ACLs

And of course no real explanation why we need the braindead access/deny
scheme at how it will get properly integrated with the system.

So in this for a clear NAK.