Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:40405 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757248AbaD1X6x (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:58:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:58:49 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -V1 00/22] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Message-ID: <20140428235849.GN15995@dastard> References: <1398615293-22931-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140427222019.GF15995@dastard> <87zjj6auvv.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87zjj6auvv.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:54:52AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Dave Chinner writes: > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 09:44:31PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> As per LSF/MM summit discussion I am reposting the richacl patchset for > >> upstream inclusion. The patchset includes minimal changes required to implement > >> a new acl model similar to NFSv4 ACL. The acl model selection is based on > >> file system feature flag. > >> > >> The following set of patches implements VFS and ext4 changes needed to implement > >> a new acl model for linux. Rich ACLs are an implementation of NFSv4 ACLs, > >> extended by file masks to fit into the standard POSIX file permission model. > >> They are designed to work seamlessly locally as well as across the NFSv4 and > >> CIFS/SMB2 network file system protocols. > >> > >> A user-space utility for displaying and changing richacls is available at [1] > >> (a number of examples can be found at http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/examples.html). .... > >> More details regarding richacl can be found at > >> http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/ > >> > >> Previous posting of the patchset can be found at: > >> http://mid.gmane.org/1319391835-5829-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com > >> "[PATCH -V8 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability" > >> > >> The complete patchset can also be found at: > >> https://github.com/kvaneesh/linux/commits/richacl-for-upstream > > > > Where are the tests? We need comprehensive coverage in xfstests so > > we can validate that it works the way it is supposed to and that we > > don't break it in future, and that all filesystems behave the same > > way.... > > > > https://github.com/kvaneesh/richacl-tools/tree/master/test FYI, I doubt very much that anyone will run a stand-alone richacls test suite regularly. Can you please work to integrate this into xfstests so it becomes a regular part of a filesystem developer's daily workflow? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com