Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:55279 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750862AbaEGU3c (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 16:29:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:29:32 -0400 From: Bruce Fields To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/70] NFSd lock scalability patches Message-ID: <20140507202932.GD9710@fieldses.org> References: <1397846704-14567-1-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <20140419205815.GA1094@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140419205815.GA1094@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 04:58:15PM -0400, Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 02:43:54PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > In accordance with the traditional Good Friday theme of "suffering", here > > is the first draft of the NFSd lock scalability patches for your perusal. > > I've only done light testing so far, but since there is a total of 70 > > patches to review, I figured you might want to start sooner rather than > > waiting for the QA folks to finish testing. > > Thanks! > > Yeah, this sounds like too much suffering for vacation time, but I'll at > least make a stab at merging the initial bug fixes next week, then try > to plow through these (or any revised version (thanks, Christoph, for > help reviewing!)) after I get back in a couple more weeks. I've at least skimmed through them all, and that's all the suffering I can handle for now. I'm assuming you'll send a new version soon. I'm applying a few of these to my for-3.16 branch, could you rebase future versions to that to avoid resending already-reviewed patches? How are you testing? Thanks again for taking on this difficult and long-overdue project.... --b.