Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:38271 "EHLO mail-ie0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932145AbaESQ4P convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 12:56:15 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y20so2908492ier.36 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] nfs: clean up function decls in nfs_page.h From: Weston Andros Adamson In-Reply-To: <20140519163620.GA10271@umich.edu> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:56:11 -0400 Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs list Message-Id: <84EC0D4A-968C-4002-B0BF-849D4F41F145@primarydata.com> References: <1400512508-7530-1-git-send-email-dros@primarydata.com> <1400512508-7530-8-git-send-email-dros@primarydata.com> <20140519152919.GA9712@umich.edu> <689E72F2-F0AA-4DA1-A8E0-C9B8F78292F3@primarydata.com> <20140519163620.GA10271@umich.edu> To: Jim Rees Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On May 19, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Jim Rees wrote: > Consistency often trumps style guidelines, and I have no strong objection to > this change. Just wanted to point it out. Right and I appreciate you pointing it out. I mistakenly thought I was following the guidelines! So, I can see how it?d be useful to have names when using basic types or when passing several arguments of the same type. Maybe we could just remove super redundant names (i.e. ?struct page *page?)? On the other hand, maybe we don?t open this can of worms and I just drop this patch from the patchset.. -dros