Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:48529 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932136AbaFWQK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:10:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:10:26 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 000/104] nfsd: eliminate the client_mutex Message-ID: <20140623161026.GA5898@fieldses.org> References: <1403189450-18729-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20140623133926.GA32746@infradead.org> <20140623095645.1fc23e9c@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20140623160001.GA24193@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140623160001.GA24193@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:00:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:56:45AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > - there is some confusion of NFSd vs nfsd in the subsystem prefixes. > > > While it seems odd and against the usual naming NFSd seems to be > > > the common one for nfs patches. > > > > > > > I tend to prefer "nfsd", but ok -- "NFSd" it is. > > I'd prefer nfsd as well, but in Rome do as the Romans do, so.. These Romans?: $ git log --pretty=format:"%s" fs/nfsd|cut -d: -f1|grep -v '^Merge'|sed 's/\[PATCH\] //'|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail 8 sunrpc 12 fs 13 locks 15 NFSd 30 SUNRPC 89 nfsd41 107 NFSD 228 knfsd 449 nfsd 594 nfsd4 Anyway, I don't care. --b.