Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com ([209.85.192.48]:44823 "EHLO mail-qg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752327AbaFWS0X (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:26:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so6186794qgd.21 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Layton Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:26:20 -0400 To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 000/104] nfsd: eliminate the client_mutex Message-ID: <20140623142620.17cff7d2@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20140623161026.GA5898@fieldses.org> References: <1403189450-18729-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20140623133926.GA32746@infradead.org> <20140623095645.1fc23e9c@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20140623160001.GA24193@infradead.org> <20140623161026.GA5898@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:10:26 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:00:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:56:45AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > - there is some confusion of NFSd vs nfsd in the subsystem prefixes. > > > > While it seems odd and against the usual naming NFSd seems to be > > > > the common one for nfs patches. > > > > > > > > > > I tend to prefer "nfsd", but ok -- "NFSd" it is. > > > > I'd prefer nfsd as well, but in Rome do as the Romans do, so.. > > These Romans?: > > $ git log --pretty=format:"%s" fs/nfsd|cut -d: -f1|grep -v '^Merge'|sed 's/\[PATCH\] //'|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail > 8 sunrpc > 12 fs > 13 locks > 15 NFSd > 30 SUNRPC > 89 nfsd41 > 107 NFSD > 228 knfsd > 449 nfsd > 594 nfsd4 > > Anyway, I don't care. > > --b. In that case, I'll go with what I prefer -- "nfsd:". But I will at least go through and make them all consistent. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton