Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([72.48.136.20]:39085 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbaFENz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:55:26 -0400 From: "Steve Wise" To: "'Bart Van Assche'" , Cc: , , References: <20140602171433.31076.5634.stgit@build.ogc.int> <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <53901ADB.9020405@acm.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:55:31 -0500 Message-ID: <002901cf80c5$d0b577e0$722067a0$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanassche@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM > To: Steve Wise; bfields@fieldses.org > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; tom@opengridcomputing.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests > > On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote: > > Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send > > work requests have been completed. > > Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ? > Yes.