Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:36922 "EHLO mail-qc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755806AbaFWQZB (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:25:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w7so6178639qcr.2 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:25:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Layton Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:24:58 -0400 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jeff Layton , bfields@fieldses.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 005/104] NFSd: Add fine grained protection for the nfs4_file->fi_stateids list Message-ID: <20140623122458.655c431e@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20140623162332.GA22250@infradead.org> References: <1403189450-18729-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <1403189450-18729-6-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20140623160407.GC24193@infradead.org> <20140623122039.78056ec9@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20140623162332.GA22250@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:23:32 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Correct. I'll add that into the desciption if you think it's warranted, > > but again that's the case with many of the patches in this series. > > It might be fairly obvious in the context of the series, it's not > if someone goes back in history with a git-blame. > > And it's not a 100% obvious with the series either, at least earlier > versions also fixes pre-existing races, although all of that might be > upstream now. > > So as far as I am concerned a simple one-line blurb mentioning what > the new locking is for would be useful to be added to all patches > just changing the locking. Fair enough. I'll do that. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton