Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com ([209.85.192.49]:40718 "EHLO mail-qg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753692AbaGUVMc (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:12:32 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so5986996qga.22 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Layton Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:12:26 -0400 To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Jeff Layton , hch@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] nfsd: Protect the nfs4_file delegation fields using the fi_lock Message-ID: <20140721171226.4a8d6769@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20140721210531.GJ8438@fieldses.org> References: <1405696416-32585-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <1405696416-32585-2-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20140718162825.GA8811@fieldses.org> <20140718133140.6a26ea4d@f20.localdomain> <20140718174957.GA12801@fieldses.org> <20140718150404.3d1e094c@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20140718192149.GC12801@fieldses.org> <20140721210531.GJ8438@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 17:05:31 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:21:49PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:04:04PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:49:57 -0400 > > > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 01:31:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:28:25 -0400 > > > > > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:13:27AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > > > Move more of the delegation fields to be protected by the fi_lock. It's > > > > > > > more granular than the state_lock and in later patches we'll want to > > > > > > > be able to rely on it in addition to the state_lock. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, the current code in nfs4_setlease calls vfs_setlease and uses the > > > > > > > client_mutex to ensure that it doesn't disappear before we can hash the > > > > > > > delegation. With the client_mutex gone, we'll have a potential race > > > > > > > condition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's possible that the delegation could be recalled after we acquire the > > > > > > > lease but before we ever get around to hashing it. If that happens, then > > > > > > > we'd have a nfs4_file that *thinks* it has a delegation, when it > > > > > > > actually has none. > > > > > > > > > > > > I understand now, thanks: so the lease break code walks the list of > > > > > > delegations associated with the file, finds none, and issues no recall, > > > > > > but the open code continues merrily on and returns a delegation, with > > > > > > the result that we return the client a delegation that will never be > > > > > > recalled. > > > > > > > > > > > > That could be worded more carefully, and would be worth a separate patch > > > > > > (since the bug predates the new locking). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that's basically correct. I'd have to think about how to fix that > > > > > with the current code. It's probably doable if you think it's > > > > > worthwhile, but I'll need to rebase this set on top of it. > > > > > > > > Well, I was wondering if this patch could just be split in two, no need > > > > to backport further than that. > > > > > > > > > > Erm, now that I've looked, I don't think it'll be that easy. The key > > > here is to ensure that fi_had_conflict is set while holding the > > > fi_lock. The trick here is that we need to take it in nfs4_setlease as > > > well, and check the flag before hashing the delegation without dropping > > > the fi_lock. > > > > OK, I'll live. For the sake of anyone that actually runs across that > > bug I'll update the summary and changelog to emphasize the bugfix over > > the locking change. > > So, intending to apply as follows. > > --b. > > commit 417c6629b2d81d5a18d29c4bbb6a9a4c64282a36 > Author: Jeff Layton > Date: Mon Jul 21 09:34:57 2014 -0400 > > nfsd: fix race that grants unrecallable delegation > > If nfs4_setlease succesfully acquires a new delegation, then another > task breaks the delegation before we reach hash_delegation_locked, then > the breaking task will see an empty fi_delegations list and do nothing. > The client will receive an open reply incorrectly granting a delegation > and will never receive a recall. > > Move more of the delegation fields to be protected by the fi_lock. It's > more granular than the state_lock and in later patches we'll want to > be able to rely on it in addition to the state_lock. > > Attempt to acquire a delegation. If that succeeds, take the spinlocks > and then check to see if the file has had a conflict show up since then. > If it has, then we assume that the lease is no longer valid and that > we shouldn't hand out a delegation. > > There's also one more potential (but very unlikely) problem. If the > lease is broken before the delegation is hashed, then it could leak. > In the event that the fi_delegations list is empty, reset the > fl_break_time to jiffies so that it's cleaned up ASAP by > the normal lease handling code. > > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > index 10cdb67..cc477dd 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > @@ -624,6 +624,8 @@ nfs4_put_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp) > > static void nfs4_put_deleg_lease(struct nfs4_file *fp) > { > + lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock); > + > if (!fp->fi_lease) > return; > if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fp->fi_delegees)) { > @@ -643,11 +645,10 @@ static void > hash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp) > { > lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock); > + lockdep_assert_held(&fp->fi_lock); > > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_DELEG_STID; > - spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > list_add(&dp->dl_perfile, &fp->fi_delegations); > - spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > list_add(&dp->dl_perclnt, &dp->dl_stid.sc_client->cl_delegations); > } > > @@ -659,17 +660,18 @@ unhash_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp) > > spin_lock(&state_lock); > dp->dl_stid.sc_type = NFS4_CLOSED_DELEG_STID; > + spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > list_del_init(&dp->dl_perclnt); > list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru); > - spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > list_del_init(&dp->dl_perfile); > spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > - spin_unlock(&state_lock); > if (fp) { > nfs4_put_deleg_lease(fp); > - put_nfs4_file(fp); > dp->dl_file = NULL; > } > + spin_unlock(&state_lock); > + if (fp) > + put_nfs4_file(fp); > } > > static void destroy_revoked_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp) > @@ -3141,10 +3143,19 @@ static void nfsd_break_deleg_cb(struct file_lock *fl) > */ > fl->fl_break_time = 0; > > - fp->fi_had_conflict = true; > spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > - list_for_each_entry(dp, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) > - nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp); > + fp->fi_had_conflict = true; > + /* > + * If there are no delegations on the list, then we can't count on this > + * lease ever being cleaned up. Set the fl_break_time to jiffies so that > + * time_out_leases will do it ASAP. The fact that fi_had_conflict is now > + * true should keep any new delegations from being hashed. > + */ > + if (list_empty(&fp->fi_delegations)) > + fl->fl_break_time = jiffies; > + else > + list_for_each_entry(dp, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile) > + nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp); > spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > } > > @@ -3491,46 +3502,77 @@ static int nfs4_setlease(struct nfs4_delegation *dp) > { > struct nfs4_file *fp = dp->dl_file; > struct file_lock *fl; > - int status; > + struct file *filp; > + int status = 0; > > fl = nfs4_alloc_init_lease(fp, NFS4_OPEN_DELEGATE_READ); > if (!fl) > return -ENOMEM; > - fl->fl_file = find_readable_file(fp); > - status = vfs_setlease(fl->fl_file, fl->fl_type, &fl); > - if (status) > - goto out_free; > + filp = find_readable_file(fp); > + if (!filp) { > + /* We should always have a readable file here */ > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > + return -EBADF; > + } > + fl->fl_file = filp; > + status = vfs_setlease(filp, fl->fl_type, &fl); > + if (status) { > + locks_free_lock(fl); > + goto out_fput; > + } > + spin_lock(&state_lock); > + spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > + /* Did the lease get broken before we took the lock? */ > + status = -EAGAIN; > + if (fp->fi_had_conflict) > + goto out_unlock; > + /* Race breaker */ > + if (fp->fi_lease) { > + status = 0; > + atomic_inc(&fp->fi_delegees); > + hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp); > + goto out_unlock; > + } > fp->fi_lease = fl; > - fp->fi_deleg_file = fl->fl_file; > + fp->fi_deleg_file = filp; > atomic_set(&fp->fi_delegees, 1); > - spin_lock(&state_lock); > hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp); > + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > spin_unlock(&state_lock); > return 0; > -out_free: > - if (fl->fl_file) > - fput(fl->fl_file); > - locks_free_lock(fl); > +out_unlock: > + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > + spin_unlock(&state_lock); > +out_fput: > + fput(filp); > return status; > } > > static int nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp) > { > + int status = 0; > + > if (fp->fi_had_conflict) > return -EAGAIN; > get_nfs4_file(fp); > + spin_lock(&state_lock); > + spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); > dp->dl_file = fp; > - if (!fp->fi_lease) > + if (!fp->fi_lease) { > + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > + spin_unlock(&state_lock); > return nfs4_setlease(dp); > - spin_lock(&state_lock); > + } > atomic_inc(&fp->fi_delegees); > if (fp->fi_had_conflict) { > - spin_unlock(&state_lock); > - return -EAGAIN; > + status = -EAGAIN; > + goto out_unlock; > } > hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp); > +out_unlock: > + spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock); > spin_unlock(&state_lock); > - return 0; > + return status; > } > > static void nfsd4_open_deleg_none_ext(struct nfsd4_open *open, int status) Looks good -- ACK. Thanks for fixing that up... -- Jeff Layton