Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from g4t3427.houston.hp.com ([15.201.208.55]:42663 "EHLO g4t3427.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755410AbaG3SQj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:16:39 -0400 From: "McEvoy, James" To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Fernandez, Roselle N" , "Palanisamy, Nandesh" Subject: RE: NFSv4.1 ACL reference implementation Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:15:37 +0000 Message-ID: <6301806E96421841896741228C6B1A2764A7DEB1@G4W3216.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <6301806E96421841896741228C6B1A2764A7C51F@G4W3216.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140729210901.GA24471@fieldses.org> <6301806E96421841896741228C6B1A2764A7DCF7@G4W3216.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140730180552.GI26316@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20140730180552.GI26316@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of J. Bruce Fields > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 11:06 AM > To: McEvoy, James > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: NFSv4.1 ACL reference implementation > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:08:25PM +0000, McEvoy, James wrote: > > We are implementing NFSv4.1 ACLs in the filesystem mostly to support > > SMB/CIFS but I am seeing some strange behavior with ACL group > > inheritance on children/grand-children using the nfs4_setfacl and > > nfs4_getfacl on the parent directory. The problems are mostly with > > inheritance on the @OWNER and @GROUP ACEs... > > The usual problem is that the umask is applied. Where can I find the proper behavior between umask and inheritance? > > > What I am looking for is a reference that I can use to validate ACL > > inheritance behavior. Is there a distro that has a filesystem which > > supports > > NFSv4 ACLs? Or ideally an rpm that I could install on a CentOS6 VM. > > I have tried using the richacl mount option on OpenSUSE 13.1 but the > > nfs4_getfacl command returns: > > "Operation to request attribute not supported." > > The fstab entry to mount the filesystem is: > > /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0QEMU_QEMU_HARDDISK_drive-scsi0-0-0-0-part3 \ > > /home ext4 acl,richacl,user_xattr 1 2 > > > > Do you have any recommendations as to what and how I can install a > > filesystem that supports nfsv4 ACLs? > > No, they all just do "posix" acls and nfsd tries to translate. > > But the umask issue is somewhat of a separate issue. > > --b. > > > > > --jim > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs- > > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of J. Bruce Fields > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:09 PM > > > To: McEvoy, James > > > Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: NFSv4.1 ACL reference implementation > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:18:03PM +0000, McEvoy, James wrote: > > > > Is there a working NFSv4.1 reference implementation available and > > > > are there > > > any instructs on how to build/install it? > > > > > > I don't recall seeing any, no. > > > > > > (Most NFSv4.0 ACL implementations should still be perfectly > > > compliant with the > > > NFSv4.1 spec too as far as I know. But I don't know of any > > > implementations of the ACL features that are new to RFC 5661. Is > > > there any particular feature that you're interested in?) > > > > > > --b. > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" > > > in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo > > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of > a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html