Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:43951 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbaHLK5L (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:57:11 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u57so9751557wes.24 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 03:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53E9F303.2030509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:57:07 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pnfs: factor GETDEVICEINFO implementations References: <1407787617-26050-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <53E9DFDD.50405@gmail.com> <20140812095242.GA6842@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20140812095242.GA6842@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/12/2014 12:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:35:25PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> This is mostly done by moving well tested code from the file and block >>> layout drivers to common code. I've only tested it using the block >>> layout driver, so testing with the other layouts would be greatly >>> appreciated. I'm mostly concerned about the object layout driver as >>> it had significant differences and missing bug fixes compared to the >>> others. >>> >> Hi Christoph >> >> Please say what BUGs have you seen in object-layout-drive? > > I've not seen actual bugs, but it's been missing various minor bug > fixes that were applied to the file layout version. > >> Do you have this on a public tree somewhere? I would like to test it? > > I didn't bother for just those few patches, but I've created a "getdeviceinfo" > branch at git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/pnfs.git > > Thanks Christoph, I'll give it a go and report. (But not today) Boaz