Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38801 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755242AbaIVW5N (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:57:13 -0400 Message-ID: <5420A946.4090805@RedHat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 18:57:10 -0400 From: Steve Dickson MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simo Sorce CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , Linux NFS Mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfs-service: Added the starting of gssproxy References: <1411413608-16462-1-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> <1411413608-16462-2-git-send-email-steved@redhat.com> <20140922152603.75005941@willson.usersys.redhat.com> <54207BCD.70101@RedHat.com> <20140922204401.GI26763@fieldses.org> <5420911D.6080506@RedHat.com> <20140922173239.05c17b2a@willson.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140922173239.05c17b2a@willson.usersys.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/22/2014 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:14:05 -0400 > Steve Dickson wrote: > >> >> >> On 09/22/2014 04:44 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/22/2014 03:26 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:20:07 -0400 >>>>> Steve Dickson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Added the gssproxy.service to both the Wants= and >>>>>> Atfers= lines, before the rpc-svcgssd.service. There >>>>>> are ConditionPathExists= lines in the rpc-svcgssd.service >>>>>> unit which will stop the rpc.svcgssd daemon from >>>>>> starting when the gssproxy daemon is already running. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson >>>>>> --- >>>>>> systemd/nfs-server.service | 5 +++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/systemd/nfs-server.service >>>>>> b/systemd/nfs-server.service index 2fa7387..c740fa2 100644 >>>>>> --- a/systemd/nfs-server.service >>>>>> +++ b/systemd/nfs-server.service >>>>>> @@ -2,12 +2,13 @@ >>>>>> Description=NFS server and services >>>>>> Requires= network.target proc-fs-nfsd.mount rpcbind.target >>>>>> Requires= nfs-mountd.service >>>>>> -Wants=rpc-statd.service nfs-idmapd.service rpc-gssd.service >>>>>> rpc-svcgssd.service +Wants=rpc-statd.service nfs-idmapd.service >>>>>> +Wants=rpc-gssd.service >>>>>> Wants=rpc-statd-notify.service >>>>>> >>>>>> After= network.target proc-fs-nfsd.mount rpcbind.target >>>>>> nfs-mountd.service After= nfs-idmapd.service rpc-statd.service >>>>>> -After= rpc-gssd.service rpc-svcgssd.service >>>>>> +After= rpc-gssd.service gssproxy.service rpc-svcgssd.service >>>>>> Before= rpc-statd-notify.service >>>>>> >>>>>> Wants=nfs-config.service >>>>> >>>>> I think you really need to insure that the modules are loaded >>>>> before any of the server services are started, perhaps adding a >>>>> unit file that exec's modprobe and has "Before: gssproxy.service >>>>> " in it ? >>>> I really don't think its needed... From my testing it appears >>>> gssproxy is always being started and rpc.svcgssd is not... >>> >>> Huh. Well rpc-svcgssd.service has var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount as >>> both "Requires=" and "After=", so rpc-svcgssd.service will never run >>> without first running var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount, which will load >>> sunrpc. But I don't see where auth_rpcgss is getting loaded. And I >>> don't see what ensures anything happening before gssproxy runs. >> It happens during the mount on the client and when the server >> is started. >> >>> >>> We want to make sure your testing's not just getting lucky on the >>> startup order. >> The reason it working is because rpc.gssd is being started on the >> server these days for callbacks and the After= line in >> rpc-svcgssd.service is being executed before the ConditionPathExists >> which cause rpc.svcgssd not to start. > > This guarantees ordering (to some degree) between rpc.gssd and > rpoc.svcgssd, but says nothing about gssproxy ... The question was how is the auth_rpcgss module being loaded. Since both rpc-svcgssd.service and rpc-gssd.service service have a After=var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount and gssproxy is requiring them, that's how auth_rpcgss is being loaded. If you only in enable gssproxy (not nfs-server or nfs-client) the module still get loaded via gssproxy,service file >> So when gssproxy.service does it's "Before=nfs-secure.service >> nfs-secure-server.service" line everything is loaded before gssproxy >> start... >> >> I'm think gssproxy.service just needs to the put the Wants and After= >> var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount lines, instead of that Before line.. > > Maybe we should add "Before: gssproxy.service rpc-svcgssd.service" > to var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount instead (and also drop any mention of > nfs services in gssproxy unit file so you have complete control of the > dependencies ? No. The loading of sunrpc and the mounting of the file system has nothing to do with starting up the gssd daemons. I would suggest gssproxy does to two things: 1) Add a Requires: nfs-utils to the spec file since you are requiring services from nfs-utils 2) Add a After=var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount to the gssproxy.service file since gssproxy could careless about either rpc.gssd or rpc.svcgssd daemons. All it is looking for is the sunrpc and auth_rpcgss kernel modules. steved. > >>> >>>> Plus, from my understanding... loading module from a service >>>> file is a big no no! People were having problems with >>>> way back when... >>> >>> Any pointers? Google's not finding me anything. >> Search the the Fedora bz's when systemd first came out... >> There were a number of "colorful" discussion on how things >> were so broken until systemd came along and saved humanity! ;-) > > This doesn't help really, I see no reason why we could not have a pre > exec statement to modprobe rpc_authgss in a unit file (whether that is > var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount or something else), to guarantee correct > ordering. > > Simo. >