Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-vc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:58452 "EHLO mail-vc0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbaIIVBj (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:01:39 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2991477vcb.15 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:01:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <540F448D.4020600@RedHat.com> References: <20140903070048.56201d1d@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <70D58138-CB00-433C-8BF8-01584E6460F0@oracle.com> <540F448D.4020600@RedHat.com> From: Chris Perl Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:01:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nfs-utils - TCP ephemeral port exhaustion results in mount failures To: Steve Dickson Cc: Trond Myklebust , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I have not seen anything.... I didn't send the patches in reply to this thread, so perhaps that confused matters. Trond already commented on the kernel one. The two patches are referenced below via gmane.org (not sure if there is a better way to direct you to them): [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/66173 (sunrpc module patch) [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/66175 (mount.nfs patch)