Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:35215 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751735AbaIWTzT (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:55:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:55:18 -0400 From: "'J. Bruce Fields'" To: Steve Wise Cc: "'Chuck Lever'" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] svcrdma: Advertise the correct max payload Message-ID: <20140923195518.GN29932@fieldses.org> References: <20140922200547.19909.68196.stgit@build.ogc.int> <465554E1-802A-4D37-8032-4E99B96B8BFB@oracle.com> <00a701cfd766$855044e0$8ff0cea0$@opengridcomputing.com> <20140923194825.GL29932@fieldses.org> <00af01cfd768$0b2d1bf0$218753d0$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <00af01cfd768$0b2d1bf0$218753d0$@opengridcomputing.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:53:28PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: 'J. Bruce Fields' [mailto:bfields@fieldses.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:48 PM > > To: Steve Wise > > Cc: 'Chuck Lever'; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] svcrdma: Advertise the correct max payload > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:42:34PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h > > > > > index c419498..a9cf5c3 100644 > > > > > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h > > > > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h > > > > > @@ -392,4 +392,8 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *svc_rdma_ctxt_cachep; > > > > > /* Workqueue created in svc_rdma.c */ > > > > > extern struct workqueue_struct *svc_rdma_wq; > > > > > > > > > > +#define RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_RDMA \ > > > > > + (RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD < (RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS << PAGE_SHIFT) ? \ > > > > > + RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD : (RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS << PAGE_SHIFT)) > > > > > + > > > > > > > > Couldn't you use: > > > > > > > > #if RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD < (RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS << PAGE_SHIFT) > > > > #define RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_RDMA RPC_MAXPAYLOAD > > > > #else > > > > #define RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_RDMA (RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS << PAGE_SHIFT) > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > That seems more idiomatic. > > > > > > Sure. That makes it easier to read in my opinion too. > > > > > > I'll send out V3 with this change. > > > > While we're bikeshedding, why not use min()? > > > > --b. > > I tried that initially. But min() and min_t() don't work because of the way we use the #define. With it defined thusly: OK, OK. Whatever works.--b. > > #define RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_RDMA min(RPC_MAXPAYLOAD, RPCRDMA_MAX_DATA_SEGS << PAGE_SHIFT) > > I see this error: > > CC [M] net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.o > net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:94: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function > make[3]: *** [net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [net/sunrpc/xprtrdma] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [net/sunrpc] Error 2 > make: *** [net] Error 2 > > min() looks like this: > > #define min(x, y) ({ \ > typeof(x) _min1 = (x); \ > typeof(y) _min2 = (y); \ > (void) (&_min1 == &_min2); \ > _min1 < _min2 ? _min1 : _min2; }) >