Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:49788 "EHLO mail-wg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753379AbaKJRSd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:18:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x13so9394995wgg.36 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:18:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5460D84A.3050704@Netapp.com> References: <20141109010328.8806.5861.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20141109011518.8806.36904.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <5460D84A.3050704@Netapp.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:21:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] NFS: SETCLIENTID XDR buffer sizes are incorrect From: Trond Myklebust To: Anna Schumaker Cc: Chuck Lever , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > It looks like this patch and the next one are general client changes, so they might have to be submitted to Trond directly rather than going through my tree. Trond, what do you think? Ditto for the iostat locking change (PATCH 08/10). None of those are RDMA related. Should I just cherrypick them from this series? -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@primarydata.com