Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:62507 "EHLO mail-vc0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932094AbaLAUI6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:08:58 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hq11so5139877vcb.3 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:08:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141201195636.GC30001@fieldses.org> References: <1416401482-2562-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20141119213758.GE14207@fieldses.org> <20141119165957.04e6e9c2@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <546DF808.1000905@Netapp.com> <20141201195636.GC30001@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:08:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] sunrpc: fixes and cleanups for svc creation and thread handling From: Trond Myklebust To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Anna Schumaker , Jeff Layton , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:17:44AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: >> On 11/19/2014 04:59 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: >> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:37:58 -0500 >> > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: >> >>> Patch #1 in this series is a bugfix, but probably isn't worth sending to >> >>> stable. The rest are just cleanups in preparation for some other patches >> >>> that I have queued up. Can you consider these for 3.19? >> >> Sure, I've read through them, they look fine. >> >> >> >> When I tried to apply them to my for-3.19 there were rejects due to >> >> tracing stuff in include/trace/events/sunrpc.h. I haven't tried to >> >> investigate yet. >> >> >> >> --b. >> >> >> > Ahh yeah. These are based on top of the tracepoint patches I sent to >> > Trond a couple of weeks ago. I think he's planning to merge those in >> > 3.19 too, but I don't think he's done that yet. Anna may have though... >> >> I have them in a private tree on my laptop that I use for testing. Want me to push them out somewhere? > > That'd help me at least test, but we need something more than a > temporary testing branch to get ready for the merge window. Choices > include: > > - Trond merges them all now, I pull that and apply these on top. > - I merge them instead, or we divide the patches between us > somehow. Worst case, it's probably even OK if there's a patch > or two that we both apply. > > In any case we need to get that sorted out now-ish as the merge window's > probably starting next week. > All patches that I plan on merging for the next window were pushed out last Friday. Jeff's tracepoint and debugfs patchset should therefore be present in my nfs-for-next and linux-next branches on git.linux-nfs.org. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@primarydata.com