Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:41540 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932112AbaLAUMg (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:12:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:12:33 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Anna Schumaker , Jeff Layton , Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] sunrpc: fixes and cleanups for svc creation and thread handling Message-ID: <20141201201233.GD30001@fieldses.org> References: <1416401482-2562-1-git-send-email-jlayton@primarydata.com> <20141119213758.GE14207@fieldses.org> <20141119165957.04e6e9c2@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <546DF808.1000905@Netapp.com> <20141201195636.GC30001@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:08:57PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:17:44AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: > >> On 11/19/2014 04:59 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > >> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:37:58 -0500 > >> > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > >> >>> Patch #1 in this series is a bugfix, but probably isn't worth sending to > >> >>> stable. The rest are just cleanups in preparation for some other patches > >> >>> that I have queued up. Can you consider these for 3.19? > >> >> Sure, I've read through them, they look fine. > >> >> > >> >> When I tried to apply them to my for-3.19 there were rejects due to > >> >> tracing stuff in include/trace/events/sunrpc.h. I haven't tried to > >> >> investigate yet. > >> >> > >> >> --b. > >> >> > >> > Ahh yeah. These are based on top of the tracepoint patches I sent to > >> > Trond a couple of weeks ago. I think he's planning to merge those in > >> > 3.19 too, but I don't think he's done that yet. Anna may have though... > >> > >> I have them in a private tree on my laptop that I use for testing. Want me to push them out somewhere? > > > > That'd help me at least test, but we need something more than a > > temporary testing branch to get ready for the merge window. Choices > > include: > > > > - Trond merges them all now, I pull that and apply these on top. > > - I merge them instead, or we divide the patches between us > > somehow. Worst case, it's probably even OK if there's a patch > > or two that we both apply. > > > > In any case we need to get that sorted out now-ish as the merge window's > > probably starting next week. > > > > All patches that I plan on merging for the next window were pushed out > last Friday. Jeff's tracepoint and debugfs patchset should therefore > be present in my nfs-for-next and linux-next branches on > git.linux-nfs.org. OK, great, I'll go take a look at that and figure out what's needed, thanks. --b.