Return-Path: dhowells@redhat.com From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20141210093405.23ffc328@tlielax.poochiereds.net> References: <20141210093405.23ffc328@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20141209053828.24756.89941.stgit@zeus.muc.hardeman.nu> <20141209080923.2708eb4f@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <4639bc17bcb236c23cfaf2bc57d98b67@hardeman.nu> <20141209095813.163ac2bb@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20141209195530.GA27798@hardeman.nu> <20141210065240.77a23160@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <33fa16f69b18ed67e3fd595b95497941@hardeman.nu> <20141210091734.3c612514@tlielax.poochiereds.net> To: Jeff Layton , ikent@redhat.com, bcodding@redhat.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, David =?UTF-8?B?SMOkcmRlbWFu?= , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, SteveD@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] gssd improvements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:02 +0000 Message-ID: <32108.1418227382@warthog.procyon.org.uk> List-ID: Jeff Layton wrote: > > This thread might be interesting: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/24/885 > > > > Nice. I wasn't aware that Ian was working on this. I'll take a look. I'm not sure what the current state of this is. There was some discussion over how best to determine which container we need to run in - and it's complicated by the fact that the mounter may run in a different container to the program that triggered the mount due to mountpoint propagation. David