Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]:54821 "EHLO mail-ig0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755989AbbAHQCg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:02:36 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a13so3496054igq.2 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:02:35 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/49] *** Add Flexfile Layout Module *** From: Weston Andros Adamson In-Reply-To: <20150108144559.GA11530@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:02:34 -0500 Cc: Tom Haynes , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs list Message-Id: <0CA807B5-8850-4413-95C0-D5BF7A52D4F4@primarydata.com> References: <1420590534-84063-1-git-send-email-loghyr@primarydata.com> <20150108144559.GA11530@infradead.org> To: Christoph Hellwig Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Jan 8, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Do you also have a git tree available? I'd like to test that the > core pnfs changes don't cause regressions for the block layout driver. > > Talking about testing, where can I get the flexfiles server to test this > layout? We have pynfs patches that I can push out soon. It hands out flexfile layouts for real data servers (not pynfs dataservers), but doesn’t properly handle fencing. Good for some basic testing, but not much else. -dros