Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:40782 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752734AbbBIUL4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:11:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:11:54 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Jeff Layton Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] xfs: implement pNFS export operations Message-ID: <20150209201154.GA27746@fieldses.org> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-20-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150205004758.GO4251@dastard> <20150205070858.GA593@lst.de> <20150205135756.GA6386@lst.de> <20150206222047.GM12722@dastard> <20150206224258.GJ29783@fieldses.org> <20150208133435.GA27081@lst.de> <20150208090942.51e99687@tlielax.poochiereds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150208090942.51e99687@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:09:42AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 14:34:35 +0100 > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:42:58PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > You'd basically just be pulling my tree (Christoph's is just my nfsd > > > tree with his patches on top, and I've been testing with exactly that > > > locally, just putting off pushing it out till we decide this.) > > > > > > So anyway, fine with me if you want to just pull that into the xfs tree. > > > Mine's ready whenever, so if I send my pull pretty soon after the merge > > > window and you send it a little later then we still keep the property > > > that Linus's merge still has a diffstat only in our respective areas. > > > > > > (OK, it's a little more complicated because I've got the same > > > arrangement with jlayton, so the order is jlayton's lock pull, then my > > > nfsd pull, then your xfs pull. Is this getting too complicated? > > > jlayton and I are both ready to so and I think it'd work.) > > > > > > I'm also fine with duplicating those few patches, or whatever. > > > > Maybe the better idea is to pull the xfs tree in the nfsd tree, but > > that would require Dave sending an early pull request so that the > > nfsd pull doesn't get delayed. > > > > Or we just defer the pnfsd merge. While I tried to get it in in time > > for 3.20 all the delays during review mean we're really late no and should > > punt it to 3.21. > > FWIW, I plan to send a pull request for the locking changes as soon as > the merge window opens. Hopefully that won't be an issue for long... This includes Christoph's branch (all but the final xfs commits): git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-3.20 That's what I intend to submit. Hope that's OK. Then it's up to Dave whether he wants to pull that in and include the xfs patches. Worst case we end up with not-yet-usable pnfs code in 3.20, which wouldn't be ideal but shouldn't cause any serious problem either. --b.