Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail.piware.de ([37.120.164.117]:44970 "EHLO mail.piware.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbbCCUMS (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:12:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 21:12:14 +0100 From: Martin Pitt To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] systemd: Relax dependencies of services Message-ID: <20150303201214.GA3473@piware.de> References: <1425403690-23847-1-git-send-email-martin.pitt@ubuntu.com> <1425403690-23847-3-git-send-email-martin.pitt@ubuntu.com> <20150303180809.GJ3058@in.waw.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20150303180809.GJ3058@in.waw.pl> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello all, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-03-03 19:08 +0100]: > Are you sure that all of those nfs daemons do not require > sockets.target and other stuff provided by basic.target to be ready? The corresponding upstart jobs trigger on virtual file systems (/sys, etc.) and rpcbind, and we've used them for years. Also, NFS does not yet use socket activation, or talks to other services on sockets (except for rpcbind), so we don't need sockets.target either. The other dependencies (some network.target, some nss-lookup.target, etc.) are already specified explicitly. So I'm quite sure. That said, there's of course always a nonzero chance that this breaks in a case which I haven't tested. In particular, I didn't test kerberos/gssd, I'd appreciate if someone who has a real-world setup with that could give this a spin. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)