Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:34989 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753241AbbDJITE (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 04:19:04 -0400 Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so10183149wgy.2 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 01:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55278774.1070304@profitbricks.com> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:19:00 +0200 From: Michael Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Gunthorpe CC: Doug Ledford , Roland Dreier , Sean Hefty , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hal Rosenstock , Tom Tucker , Steve Wise , Hoang-Nam Nguyen , Christoph Raisch , Mike Marciniszyn , Eli Cohen , Faisal Latif , Upinder Malhi , Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , "David S. Miller" , Ira Weiny , PJ Waskiewicz , Tatyana Nikolova , Or Gerlitz , Jack Morgenstein , Haggai Eran , Ilya Nelkenbaum , Yann Droneaud , Bart Van Assche , Shachar Raindel , Sagi Grimberg , Devesh Sharma , Matan Barak , Moni Shoua , Jiri Kosina , Selvin Xavier , Mitesh Ahuja , Li RongQing , Rasmus Villemoes , Alex Estrin , Eric Dumazet , Erez Shitrit , Tom Gundersen , Chuck Lever Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] IB/Verbs: Implement new callback query_transport() for each HW References: <5523CCD5.6030401@profitbricks.com> <5523D098.3020007@profitbricks.com> <1428517786.2980.180.camel@redhat.com> <20150408201015.GB28666@obsidianresearch.com> <552673B0.7040500@profitbricks.com> <20150409160054.GB2035@obsidianresearch.com> In-Reply-To: <20150409160054.GB2035@obsidianresearch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/09/2015 06:00 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:42:24PM +0200, Michael Wang wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 10:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> [snip] >>> >>> Some of the other checks in this file revolve around pkey, I'm not >>> sure what rocee does there? cap_pkey_supported ? >> >> I'm not sure if this count in capability... how shall we describe it? > > I'm not sure how rocee uses pkey, but maybe the the GRH and pkey thing > would work well together under a single 'cap_ethernet_ah' ? Sounds better, we can use this in all the case that handling address for eth-link-layer :-) Regards, Michael Wang > > Jason >