Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42167 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030415AbbD1Rtg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:49:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:49:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Sachin Bhamare , Jeff Layton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix pNFS return on close semantics Message-ID: <20150428174934.GA5887@lst.de> References: <1430139014-28013-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1430139014-28013-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150427203943.GI4083@fieldses.org> <20150427193008.1195d7dd@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20150428081456.GA21413@lst.de> <20150428160353.GN4083@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150428160353.GN4083@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:03:53PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > I'm ok with a cc to stable, but it's a bit borderline. Note that currently > > you even applied my two patches to your 4.2 incoming queue, not even 4.1.. > > Yeah, those -incoming branches are random works-in-progress and will get > rebased frequently, I'll move the other to for-4.1 and leave this one > for 4.2. I would prefer if we could queue it up for 4.1 if possible.