Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:58518 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754635AbbFEQKh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:10:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 18:10:21 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Tejun Heo , Ingo Molnar , Richard Weinberger , Steven Rostedt , David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Kosina , Borislav Petkov , Michal Hocko , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/18] kthread: Make it easier to correctly sleep in iterant kthreads Message-ID: <20150605161021.GJ19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1433516477-5153-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <1433516477-5153-10-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1433516477-5153-10-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:01:08PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Many kthreads go into an interruptible sleep when there is nothing > to do. They should check if anyone did not requested the kthread > to terminate, freeze, or park in the meantime. It is easy to do > it a wrong way. INTERRUPTIBLE is the wrong state to idle in for kthreads, use TASK_IDLE. --- commit 80ed87c8a9ca0cad7ca66cf3bbdfb17559a66dcf Author: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri May 8 14:23:45 2015 +0200 sched/wait: Introduce TASK_NOLOAD and TASK_IDLE Currently people use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to idle kthreads and wait for 'work' because TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE contributes to the loadavg. Having all idle kthreads contribute to the loadavg is somewhat silly. Now mostly this works OK, because kthreads have all their signals masked. However there's a few sites where this is causing problems and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE should be used, except for that loadavg issue. This patch adds TASK_NOLOAD which, when combined with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE avoids the loadavg accounting. As most of imagined usage sites are loops where a thread wants to idle, waiting for work, a helper TASK_IDLE is introduced. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Julian Anastasov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: NeilBrown Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index dd07ac03f82a..7de815c6fa78 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -218,9 +218,10 @@ print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); #define TASK_WAKEKILL 128 #define TASK_WAKING 256 #define TASK_PARKED 512 -#define TASK_STATE_MAX 1024 +#define TASK_NOLOAD 1024 +#define TASK_STATE_MAX 2048 -#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZxKWP" +#define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZxKWPN" extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!( sizeof(TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR)-1 != ilog2(TASK_STATE_MAX)+1)]; @@ -230,6 +231,8 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!( #define TASK_STOPPED (TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_STOPPED) #define TASK_TRACED (TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_TRACED) +#define TASK_IDLE (TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_NOLOAD) + /* Convenience macros for the sake of wake_up */ #define TASK_NORMAL (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) #define TASK_ALL (TASK_NORMAL | __TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED) @@ -245,7 +248,8 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!( ((task->state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0) #define task_contributes_to_load(task) \ ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0 && \ - (task->flags & PF_FROZEN) == 0) + (task->flags & PF_FROZEN) == 0 && \ + (task->state & TASK_NOLOAD) == 0) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h index 30fedaf3e56a..d57a575fe31f 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/sched.h +++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h @@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch, __print_flags(__entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX-1), "|", { 1, "S"} , { 2, "D" }, { 4, "T" }, { 8, "t" }, { 16, "Z" }, { 32, "X" }, { 64, "x" }, - { 128, "K" }, { 256, "W" }, { 512, "P" }) : "R", + { 128, "K" }, { 256, "W" }, { 512, "P" }, + { 1024, "N" }) : "R", __entry->prev_state & TASK_STATE_MAX ? "+" : "", __entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio) );