Return-Path: Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([72.48.136.20]:36318 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755074AbbHCTcf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:32:35 -0400 From: "Steve Wise" To: "'Sagi Grimberg'" , Cc: , , , , , , , , References: <20150724161331.25617.8475.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <20150724161848.25617.26092.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <55B4B190.7070305@dev.mellanox.co.il> <55B5404F.5040404@opengridcomputing.com> In-Reply-To: <55B5404F.5040404@opengridcomputing.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 6/9] isert: Rename IO functions to more descriptive names Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:32:35 -0500 Message-ID: <000001d0ce23$27048810$750d9830$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Steve, > > > > I've given this some thought and I think we should avoid splitting > > logic from PI and iWARP. The reason (other than code duplication) is > > that currently the iser target support only up to 1MB IOs. I have some > > code (not done yet) to support larger IOs by using multiple > > registrations per IO (with or without PI). > > With a little tweaking I think we can get iwarp to fit in too... > > > > So, do you mind if I take a crack at it? > > Sure, go ahead. Let me know how I can help. Certainly I can test it > for you. I'm very keen to get this in for 4.3 if possible... > Hey Sagi, how is this coming along? How can I help? Steve.