Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:47804 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbbIHGBl (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:01:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 23:01:36 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus Torvalds , Trond Myklebust , Linux NFS Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Oleg Drokin , Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes Message-ID: <20150908060136.GA6220@infradead.org> References: <1441659544.3163.4.camel@primarydata.com> <20150908115900.4182d55a@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150908115900.4182d55a@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:59:00AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > This contains about 12 commits new since Sept 1 and the last 6 are only > appearing in linux-next today (though I did not do Friday and Monday's > linux-next). Not judging, just noting. And one of tese recent commits causes a regression for block layouts in xfstests generic/075. Still need to check which one. Trond, I think it's really time the NFS client gets regular automated tests at least against the Linux server for v3/4/4.1/pNFS - I'm finding regressions pretty much every time I kick off a simple xfstests run.