Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:37321 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753746AbbI3GrT (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:47:19 -0400 Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so46434061wic.0 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API To: Bart Van Assche , Sagi Grimberg , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org References: <1442482947-27785-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <560AE099.2080004@sandisk.com> <560AFB71.3010003@dev.mellanox.co.il> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" From: Sagi Grimberg Message-ID: <560B8572.1000305@dev.mellanox.co.il> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:47:14 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <560AFB71.3010003@dev.mellanox.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bart, >> How has the converted SRP initiator driver been tested ? With the kernel >> tree that is available on branch reg_api.4 > > That's odd. Although I haven't formally submitted reg_api.4 yet, I did > test ib_srp initiator against upstream srpt over CX3 (mlx4) and CX4 > (mlx5). I ran connect, disconnect, stress IO of all block sizes and > some unaligned block-IO and SG_IO test utilities. It all seems to pass > for me. > > Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I > placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and > see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen > any sign of it)? I'm waiting for your input before submitting v2 of this series. Thanks, Sagi.