Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1442482947-27785-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com>
 <560AE099.2080004@sandisk.com> <560AFB71.3010003@dev.mellanox.co.il>
CC: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Message-ID: <560C30F4.50900@sandisk.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:59:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <560AFB71.3010003@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 09/29/2015 01:58 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 9/29/2015 10:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 09/17/2015 02:42 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>> - Converted SRP initiator and RDS iwarp ULPs to the new API
>> How has the converted SRP initiator driver been tested ? With the kernel
>> tree that is available on branch reg_api.4
>
> That's odd. Although I haven't formally submitted reg_api.4 yet, I did
> test ib_srp initiator against upstream srpt over CX3 (mlx4) and CX4
> (mlx5). I ran connect, disconnect, stress IO of all block sizes and
> some unaligned block-IO and SG_IO test utilities. It all seems to pass
> for me.
>
> Just this morning (my morning) I tested the v2 set on iser, srp, nfs. I
> placed that in branch reg_api.5. Would you mind running reg_api.5 and
> see if this issue persist (I would be surprised because I haven't seen
> any sign of it)?

Sorry but I still see these messages with the reg_api.5 branch.
[root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# git show HEAD | grep ^commit
commit 3b5b34777d3cd606433f0aca51e3885323648e07
[root@ib-ini linux-kernel]# uname -a
Linux ib-ini 4.2.0-rc6-debug+ #1 SMP Wed Sep 30 11:38:36 PDT 2015 x86_64 
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I will try to run a bisect.

Bart.