Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:36055 "EHLO mail-lb0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754279AbbJGNq5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:46:57 -0400 Received: by lbcao8 with SMTP id ao8so11844762lbc.3 for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:46:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1444073830-21854-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <20151006090746.GA27791@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:46:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/43] Richacls From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: James Morris Cc: Pavel Machek , Alexander Viro , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , linux-ext4 , LKML , linux-fsdevel , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux API Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:33 AM, James Morris wrote: > Are many distros planning on enabling this? I gather RH is... It's a per-filesystem feature, so it's the admin's choice (if compiled in). On ext4, you have to set the richacl feature flag to get Richacls instead of POSIX ACLs. Andreas