Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:33926 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752674AbbJMDrL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:47:11 -0400 Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so4203625obb.1 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:47:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:47:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Adding issync field to delegreturn_exit tracepoint From: Trond Myklebust To: Olga Kornievskaia Cc: linux-nfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > It'll be nice to know when we return delegations synchronously or not. Why? This patch forces us to carry an otherwise completely unnecessary parameter, so at the very minimum we should have a discussion of what the real use cases are.