Return-Path: Received: from mx144.netapp.com ([216.240.21.25]:60292 "EHLO mx144.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239AbbKKOAV (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:00:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] VFS: In-kernel copy system call To: Al Viro References: <1447192413-15376-1-git-send-email-Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> <20151111033827.GJ22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> CC: , , , , , , , , , From: Anna Schumaker Message-ID: <564349EB.7030900@Netapp.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:00:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151111033827.GJ22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/10/2015 10:38 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:53:29PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: >> Copy system calls came up during Plumbers a while ago, mostly because several >> filesystems (including NFS and XFS) are currently working on copy acceleration >> implementations. We haven't heard from Zach Brown in a while, so I volunteered >> to push his patches upstream so individual filesystems don't need to keep >> writing their own ioctls. > > OK, taken for the next cycle. FWIW, I'm going to toss COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE > counterpart in as well - right now it's doing only native, AFAICS. > Thanks, Al!