Return-Path: Received: from quartz.orcorp.ca ([184.70.90.242]:37389 "EHLO quartz.orcorp.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022AbbKYT2j (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:28:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:28:24 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: santosh shilimkar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Tom Talpey , Chuck Lever , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: Future of FMR support, was: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR Message-ID: <20151125192824.GD3223@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20151123220627.32702.62667.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20151123221430.32702.86114.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <5653B606.3070700@talpey.com> <20151124065225.GB29141@infradead.org> <5654DC7A.7080807@oracle.com> <20151125090009.GA11255@infradead.org> <5655EB40.8070508@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5655EB40.8070508@oracle.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, santosh shilimkar wrote: > >I'd say drop the current iWarp transport if it's not testable. The > >only real difference between IB and iWarp is the needed to create > >a MR for the RDMA READ sink, and we're much better of adding that into > >the current IB transport if new iWarp users show up. > > Agree. I will probably do it along with RDS IB FR support in 4.6 Great news! Jason