Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:33884 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbbKZKB3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:01:29 -0500 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so23389188wmv.1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:01:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Future of FMR support, was: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] xprtrdma: Add ro_unmap_sync method for FMR To: Jason Gunthorpe , santosh shilimkar References: <20151123220627.32702.62667.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20151123221430.32702.86114.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <5653B606.3070700@talpey.com> <20151124065225.GB29141@infradead.org> <5654DC7A.7080807@oracle.com> <20151125090009.GA11255@infradead.org> <5655EB40.8070508@oracle.com> <20151125192824.GD3223@obsidianresearch.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Tom Talpey , Chuck Lever , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg From: Sagi Grimberg Message-ID: <5656D874.8060500@dev.mellanox.co.il> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:01:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151125192824.GD3223@obsidianresearch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 25/11/2015 21:28, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, santosh shilimkar wrote: >>> I'd say drop the current iWarp transport if it's not testable. The >>> only real difference between IB and iWarp is the needed to create >>> a MR for the RDMA READ sink, and we're much better of adding that into >>> the current IB transport if new iWarp users show up. >> >> Agree. I will probably do it along with RDS IB FR support in 4.6 > > Great news! Great news indeed! Looking forward to seeing this.