Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:49305 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755793AbbLDQtp (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:49:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:49:44 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Anna Schumaker Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@primarydata.com, hch@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] NFSD: Implement the COPY call Message-ID: <20151204164944.GA27725@fieldses.org> References: <1449176137-4940-1-git-send-email-Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> <1449176137-4940-3-git-send-email-Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> <20151204154549.GD26898@fieldses.org> <5661B604.1010402@Netapp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5661B604.1010402@Netapp.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:49:24AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: > On 12/04/2015 10:45 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:55:35PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: > >> @@ -498,6 +499,22 @@ __be32 nfsd4_set_nfs4_label(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, > >> } > >> #endif > >> > >> +ssize_t nfsd_copy_range(struct file *src, u64 src_pos, > >> + struct file *dst, u64 dst_pos, > >> + u64 count) > >> +{ > >> + ssize_t bytes; > >> + u64 limit = 0x10000000; > > > > Why that value? Could I get a comment here? > > Whoops! I had a comment there at one point, but I must have deleted it :(. That value is to cap copies to 256MB. Could you include some justification for the choice of that particular value? > >> + if (count > limit) > >> + count = limit; > >> + > >> + bytes = vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0); > > > > Sorry, I lost track of the copy discussions: does this only work on > > filesystems with special support, or does it fall back on doing the copy > > by hand? Which filesystems (of the exportable filesystems) support > > this? > > The system call falls back on doing the copy by hand if there is no filesystem acceleration. Is this practical? It means a huge range in possible latency of the single COPY call depending on filesystem. I guess I can live with it and we can see if people run into problems in practice. But let's make sure this is documented. --b.