Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.213.42]:35990 "EHLO mail-vk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752847AbcBOLfQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:35:16 -0500 Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c3so104919787vkb.3 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 03:35:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C1A788.9020008@gmail.com> References: <56B770B6.7040803@gmail.com> <56B77262.7090107@gmail.com> <56C0F150.60008@gmail.com> <56C1A788.9020008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:35:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments From: Andreas Gruenbacher To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-ext4 , XFS Developers , lkml , linux-fsdevel , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Linux API , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Jeff Layton , Andreas Dilger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > You're right. I was confusing with xattr(7). So, I think it might > make some sense to eventually move both of these into man-pages (for > richacl(7), at least, it's probably worth delaying this for a bit), > since they're describing kernel-user-space interfaces. Well, the actual user-space interface is xattrs in both cases. > I can see counter-arguments too, such as these pages are closely > related to the corresponding user-space libraries you maintain. > What do you think? I would keep the man-pages where they are right now, but I don't have a strong preference. Andreas