Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:53393 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932228AbcCKORD (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:17:03 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:17:01 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Alexander Viro , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Andreas Dilger , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Anna Schumaker Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 18/22] richacl: xattr mapping functions Message-ID: <20160311141701.GE14808@infradead.org> References: <1456733847-17982-1-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> <1456733847-17982-19-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1456733847-17982-19-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > +#include > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); what's the point given that the code isn't even modolar? > +static void > +fix_xattr_from_user(const char *kname, void *kvalue, size_t size) > +{ > + if (strncmp(kname, XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX, XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN)) > + return; > + kname += XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN; > + if (!strcmp(kname, XATTR_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS) || > + !strcmp(kname, XATTR_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT)) > + posix_acl_fix_xattr_from_user(kvalue, size); > +} > > /* > * Extended attribute SET operations > @@ -329,9 +339,7 @@ setxattr(struct dentry *d, const char __user *name, const void __user *value, > error = -EFAULT; > goto out; > } > - if ((strcmp(kname, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS) == 0) || > - (strcmp(kname, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT) == 0)) > - posix_acl_fix_xattr_from_user(kvalue, size); > + fix_xattr_from_user(kname, kvalue, size); > } > > error = vfs_setxattr(d, kname, kvalue, size, flags); > @@ -396,6 +404,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(fsetxattr, int, fd, const char __user *, name, > return error; > } > > +static void > +fix_xattr_to_user(const char *kname, void *kvalue, size_t size) > +{ > + if (strncmp(kname, XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX, XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN)) > + return; > + kname += XATTR_SYSTEM_PREFIX_LEN; > + if (!strcmp(kname, XATTR_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS) || > + !strcmp(kname, XATTR_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT)) > + posix_acl_fix_xattr_to_user(kvalue, size); > +} > + > /* > * Extended attribute GET operations > */ > @@ -426,9 +445,7 @@ getxattr(struct dentry *d, const char __user *name, void __user *value, > > error = vfs_getxattr(d, kname, kvalue, size); > if (error > 0) { > - if ((strcmp(kname, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS) == 0) || > - (strcmp(kname, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT) == 0)) > - posix_acl_fix_xattr_to_user(kvalue, size); > + fix_xattr_to_user(kname, kvalue, size); I don't see how this is related to the rest of the patch. > +++ b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h What's the point in splitting this from the richacl.h header? Same for the uapi versions. > +struct richacl_xattr { > + unsigned char a_version; > + unsigned char a_flags; Explicit __u8 for uapi headers, please.