Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:32866 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750962AbcCVBCv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:02:51 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Making an interface for alternative data streams From: Richard Yao In-Reply-To: <20160322001255.GA2353@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:02:46 -0400 Cc: Cedric Blancher , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , Christoph Hellwig Message-Id: <009F3E87-7919-4774-9129-72DB08F76553@gentoo.org> References: <56F03945.40208@gentoo.org> <56F05745.50204@gentoo.org> <20160321204041.GA807@fieldses.org> <20160321223627.GA12999@thunk.org> <20160322001255.GA2353@fieldses.org> To: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Mar 21, 2016, at 8:12 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:48:04PM +0100, Cedric Blancher wrote: >> Old invalid argument, and Sophos and Symatec look there as well. >> >> If it was a bad idea, why has Linux fs attributes which are almost the >> same as O_XATTR except that they use a custom api? Why does Macos have >> alternate streams (called forks)? Why did Solaris adopt it long ago >> (and still gets support questions about it - just saying before >> someone argues that no one uses THAT)? > > Could you point us at some of those users? I am told that Samba users would love this functionality. > > --b.