Return-Path: Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:36535 "EHLO mail-yw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752480AbcCVQPp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:15:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56F0AC2A.30300@gentoo.org> References: <56F03945.40208@gentoo.org> <56F05745.50204@gentoo.org> <20160321204041.GA807@fieldses.org> <20160321223627.GA12999@thunk.org> <20160322001255.GA2353@fieldses.org> <009F3E87-7919-4774-9129-72DB08F76553@gentoo.org> <56F0AC2A.30300@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:15:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Making an interface for alternative data streams From: Richard Sharpe To: Richard Yao Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Cedric Blancher , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/21/2016 09:02 PM, Richard Yao wrote: >> >>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 8:12 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:48:04PM +0100, Cedric Blancher wrote: >>>> Old invalid argument, and Sophos and Symatec look there as well. >>>> >>>> If it was a bad idea, why has Linux fs attributes which are almost the >>>> same as O_XATTR except that they use a custom api? Why does Macos have >>>> alternate streams (called forks)? Why did Solaris adopt it long ago >>>> (and still gets support questions about it - just saying before >>>> someone argues that no one uses THAT)? >>> >>> Could you point us at some of those users? >> >> I am told that Samba users would love this functionality. > > Someone pinged me in IRC to let me know that Steve French was talking > about this earlier this month: > >> Have there been any suggestions on how to list alternate data streams >> on a file other than using a pseudo-xattr as ntfs-3g does (querying >> xattr ntfs.streams.list - see http://linux.die.net/man/8/ntfs-3g)? > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cifs/11681 > > Windows appears to have name-value pair attributes and alternative data > streams in separate name-spaces simultaneously. And it is more convoluted than that. If you use reparse points on a file you cannot use name-value pair attributes (Windows Extended Attributes) and vice versa, because they overloaded one of the fields use to report on those things. Of course, pretty much no one uses Windows Extended Attributes these days, I believe. However, plenty of Samba users store Windows ACLs in Linux XATTRs ... -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)