Return-Path: Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.51]:35163 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753367AbcC2WhB convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 18:37:01 -0400 From: Junichi Nomura To: Al Viro CC: Arend van Spriel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 4.6-rc1] NFS mounts (using autofs) failing Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:36:05 +0000 Message-ID: <56FB0355.2030506@ce.jp.nec.com> References: <56FA62FB.1080506@broadcom.com> <20160329140244.GV17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <56FAD4B4.3070508@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <56FAD4B4.3070508@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/30/16 04:17, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 29-03-16 16:02, Al Viro wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:11:55PM +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >>> Moved to 4.6-rc1 and found NFS mounts were failing moving to the new >>> kernel. The NFS mounts are done using autofs. Below is the bisect log >>> and attached the kernel .config file. Let me know if you need any other >>> information. >> >> AFAICS, it's the same one that got reported yesterday by Junichi Nomura. >> Folks, could you check if the delta below fixes it? > > Works for me so you may add > > Tested-by: Arend van Spriel Yes, that works for me, too. Thank you. Tested-by: Jun'ichi Nomura -- Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation