Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56617 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752101AbcDSXNW (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:13:22 -0400 From: NeilBrown To: Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , Thomas Haynes Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:13:09 +1000 Cc: "linux-nfs\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: AUTH_NONE at top of SECINFO_NONAME reply. In-Reply-To: References: <87k2k1jd8d.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <20160418182633.GA3193@fieldses.org> <871t61i96f.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Message-ID: <87fuuhyyyi.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Apr 20 2016, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On 4/19/16, 17:24, "NeilBrown" wrote: > >>I wonder if "none" means "no authentication needed" or "no access >>given". > > A certain thomas@netapp.com explained the behaviour thus: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg09743.html > Ahhh, cool. Thanks! NeilBrown --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXFruHAAoJEDnsnt1WYoG5PXEP/iW30TdfM09Kfb/MLj8sMO3g FSYVe10ISLnLZ6wXgJwFL9QjFCvhYm9VEtU9ka+oBarrj5qNqSPYFWyb1Q7xfoL8 KD2wS9VFknXZqJN2bp8Ayy7s78Ey+f1cCii3I6UtnkHplSNI5sDyMH12Y+/9vnWM gq4wvxpwX4YYk7u/dLhMdztAVHKbXukni/elIEsmrLD6nj1CiuLcZWyZJ2DuVY9u Jm+XPxePuK4erFLHZVLXCMp7fmP1WLJC+BXKh/poOyrfOrjpBL24zFSe43fqrAFV p2KBtx/udNebVwg6e03kQbqm/RiPrEydx7qM31givDTnz0x+p6x+vWVzKXgbdbE6 ad6Ew7/mqcFX/TG3oXsVVLI0lum2ZDFP/kegnkQh/TT+VmD78MQ+HTXLgYW4aho/ VMkU7jakoxyyKr6FYROEfkfjeqZtGzaf/H/e4Kp8/TvXf/HBgCM+ZuHJtgueyV6s n99SDgfIsaMBCU+F+LRhnTew/fqjsYbDMERHcl8kCWKTcwQ49ofKYnLq2m1uEHn6 pF43i9eJqVQMUD0dRxydrI70rp8YQUhFhlpwLtKkvObY/NtnO7OLtwK+jL3KjYqx yQSFjczfAeoCuJjql48Syp2nirmL1huPaHeDsjMuHBJjjD2rytWcvul8p4uLH72W A03q5OxK8GpzOYZUSVKv =/kCy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--