Return-Path: Received: from smtp-o-1.desy.de ([131.169.56.154]:39968 "EHLO smtp-o-1.desy.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161799AbcE3S3p convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2016 14:29:45 -0400 Received: from smtp-map-1.desy.de (smtp-map-1.desy.de [131.169.56.66]) by smtp-o-1.desy.de (DESY-O-1) with ESMTP id 37E25280943 for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ZITSWEEP4.win.desy.de (zitsweep4.win.desy.de [131.169.97.98]) by smtp-map-1.desy.de (DESY_MAP_1) with ESMTP id 2093313E9B for ; Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:41 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:41 +0200 (CEST) From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" To: Jeff Layton Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List , Trond Myklebust Message-ID: <814812120.15151348.1464632981013.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> In-Reply-To: <1464631095.13639.6.camel@poochiereds.net> References: <1897196982.15107146.1464620758631.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <345347427.15123988.1464623475380.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> <1464631095.13639.6.camel@poochiereds.net> Subject: Re: Infinit LAYOUTGET with mmap MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: the 4.7 have the same behavior... capture file: https://desycloud.desy.de/public.php?service=files&t=5e26a8d73ed6aacbdbf49e4c8f1cc01a&download Tigran. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Layton" > To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" > Cc: "Trond Myklebust" > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 7:58:15 PM > Subject: Re: Infinit LAYOUTGET with mmap > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 17:51 +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: >> >> re-sending, as it never arrived.... >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > >> > From: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" >> > To: "Linux NFS Mailing List" >> > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2016 5:05:59 PM >> > Subject: Infinit LAYOUTGET with mmap >> > >> > Dear NFS developers, >> > >> > On my test system I hit a behavior of the nfs client with >> > kernel 4.4 which I haven't seen before. >> > >> > >> > Here is a minimal example to reproduce the issue: >> > >> > ============= bug.c ===================== >> > >> > #include >> > #include >> > #include >> > #include >> > #include >> > >> > >> > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) >> > { >> > >> >    int *m; >> >    int fd; >> >    int err; >> > >> >    fd = open(argv[1], O_CREAT| O_RDWR, O_TRUNC, 0666); >> >    if (fd < 0) { >> >        perror("failed to open file"); >> >        exit(1); >> >    } >> > >> >    err = ftruncate(fd, 4096); >> >    if (err) { >> >        perror("cant set filesize"); >> >        exit(2); >> >    } >> > >> >    m = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); >> >    if (m == MAP_FAILED) { >> >        perror("failed to map the file"); >> >        exit(2); >> >    } >> > >> >    m[1] = 0; >> > >> >    err = munmap(m, 4096); >> >    if (err) { >> >        perror("failed to unmap the file"); >> >    } >> > >> >    close(fd); >> > } >> > =============== end of example ================ >> > >> > >> > >> > When  running this code, client send an OPEN with share_access >> > OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH. But later calient sends LAYOUTGET with >> > IOMODE_READ >> > followed by GETDEVICEINFO. >> > >> > This combination of LG+GDI remain for ever. The capture file is >> > attached. >> > >> > My guess it that client expects RW layout. >> > >> > Kernel: 4.4.9-300.fc23.x86_64. I will try with upstream as well. >> > >> > Thanks a lot, >> >    Tigran. > > No capture attached, but 4.7 should be getting a major overhaul to the > LAYOUTGET retry handling code. You may want to re-test with a bleeding > edge kernel and see if the problem is still present. > > Cheers, > -- > Jeff Layton > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html