Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:33656 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932317AbcFODS3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:18:29 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 23/24] svc: Avoid garbage replies when pc_func() returns rpc_drop_reply From: Chuck Lever To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20160615031824.14794.14994.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> In-Reply-To: <20160615030626.14794.43805.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> References: <20160615030626.14794.43805.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: If an RPC program does not set vs_dispatch and pc_func() returns rpc_drop_reply, the server sends a reply anyway containing a single word containing the value RPC_DROP_REPLY (in network byte-order, of course). This is a nonsense RPC message. Fixes: 9e701c610923 ("svcrpc: simpler request dropping") Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever --- net/sunrpc/svc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c index cc98528..87290a5 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c @@ -1188,7 +1188,8 @@ svc_process_common(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct kvec *argv, struct kvec *resv) *statp = procp->pc_func(rqstp, rqstp->rq_argp, rqstp->rq_resp); /* Encode reply */ - if (test_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags)) { + if (*statp == rpc_drop_reply || + test_bit(RQ_DROPME, &rqstp->rq_flags)) { if (procp->pc_release) procp->pc_release(rqstp, NULL, rqstp->rq_resp); goto dropit;