Return-Path: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 01:22:16 -0700 From: "hch@infradead.org" To: Benjamin Coddington Cc: Trond Myklebust , "hch@infradead.org" , List Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 24/28] Getattr doesn't require data sync semantics Message-ID: <20160721082216.GA15247@infradead.org> References: <1467844205-76852-23-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-24-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <1467844205-76852-25-git-send-email-trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> <20160718034847.GA1195@infradead.org> <1468817945.5273.2.camel@primarydata.com> <20160719035843.GA24437@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:03:06AM -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > > > This debug output is identical for every cycle of the loop. Have to > > > stop for the > > > day.. more tomorrow. > > > > > > Ben > > > > > > > Duh??? It???s this patch: pNFS: Fix post-layoutget error handling in > > pnfs_update_layout() > > We have to pass through fatal errors??? I???ll fix it. > > That's indeed fixed it up, and generic/207 passes now. Thanks! So I spoke too soon in my last mail, generic/207 still fails for me with Trond's linux-next tree, although much later in the test now. Does it include the changes that are supposed to fix the issue?